Here, users can nominate and vote for Zelda Wiki's next featured article. Any article worthy of being featured exemplifies the Wiki's quality standards, and goes above and beyond what is expected in a normal encyclopedia entry. Featured articles should:

Have exceptionally fluid American English grammar and spelling.
Be lengthy, yet detailed.
Be well organized (as in subdivisions).
Cite sources, and cite them properly.
Be properly categorized.
Contain the most up-to-date information possible.
Have no template requesting improvement, merging, deletion, or any template that may in some way state the article is not of excellent quality. In this respect, there should be no duplicate of the nominated article, nor should the article be a duplicate of another page.
NOT be copied from Wikipedia, or from any site that does not run the Wiki, under any circumstances!

For help on the correct format used to add nominations or votes, see the Featured Content Help.

Rules:
Scoring and conditions for passing a nomination:

All nominations start with an initial score of zero.
A supporting vote adds 1 to the score.
An opposing vote subtracts 1 from the score.
An article needs to achieve a score of +5 within 4 months of the nomination date in order to be featured.
A nomination automatically fails if the score drops to -3.

Voting:

You may only vote once on any particular article.
You may not vote on any articles you have nominated.
Votes should be added beneath the relevant header (either support or opposition), with # at the beginning of the line. The current score must be updated to reflect this new vote.
Supporting votes should include a brief message stating why the article should be featured.
Opposing votes must specify how the article fails to meet one or more of the qualifying criteria described above.
All votes MUST be signed using ~~~~ If you do not sign, your vote WILL NOT be counted!

Current nominations

Four Sword

File:FourSword Artwork.png

Like most of the major weapons and items in the series, the Four Sword page has received an outstanding article. With amazing amounts of information, great image usage and plenty of references, I for one say this page is now worthy of featuring.—ZENOX ^T C 11:01, 21 November 2010 (EST)

Support

The information, as said above, is fantastic, well written, interesting, and full of a lot of knowledge on the subject. There was a lot of things in the article that I found that interested me and helped clear any confusion I had on the subject. DEFINATELY deserves to be featured. - AtrumLevis (My Talk Page) (My Contributions) 12:38, 1 December 2010 (EST)
The information is very in-depth and interesting. The article is a good length for the topic. It gives all the information needed and more. This article definitely deserves to be featured. Danton12396 16:39, 1 December 2010 (EST)
I think this article is definitely well-written. 18:21, 21 January 2011 (EST)
This article is truly one of the more impressive one here on Zelda Wiki. Extensive information covering all possible questions one might have, combined with excellent image use make this article a legend in itself. --HyperLink12 19:24, 23 July 2011 (EDT)
This article is very well written and clearly explains the role the Four Sword plays in the plot of each game it is featured in.Vulpix001 16:37, 27 July 2011 (EDT)
Before I read this article I knew nothing about the four sword. Now I know practically everything!This article contains tons of information, with no typos to be seen. That's why I vote for this article. --17:00, 21 October 2011 (EDT)Person777 17:00, 21 October 2011 (EDT)
While I do think this article could use minor trimmings to cut down the verbosity, this article is tautly referenced, attractive, and reads smoothly. Excellent nomination. User:Cipriano/sig 00:42, 25 November 2011 (EST)

Opposition

Neutral Comments

Negated/Retracted Votes

I think the four sword has great design and cool powers. I mean, what other item can turn Link into 4 copies of himself? Besides, it is the main weapon in one of my favorite zelda games, the minish cap. Four Swords is also good, but I like mc better. Therefore, I nominate this article. "Link4569 16:19, 11 January 2011 (EST)"
Personal like has nothing to do with the article in question.User:Mandi/sig 01:02, January 12, 2011 (UTC)

River Zora

File:Zola.png

This page was refreshing for me. It's an older enemy that got limited exposure in the series. I thought the article was well-fleshed out and in-depth for such unpopular enemy. It has plenty of references, lots of details, a pleasing layout, everything you'd want in an article.User:Matt/sig 02:33, February 16, 2011 (UTC)

Support

Definitely one of the best enemy pages on the site, its got quite a nice layout without losing vital information, and doesn't confuse details across games unlike many other enemy articles. If it has any faults, its that it probably has a few too many images at the moment of writing, but it has a lot of accurate information and is presented in a good manner. Fizzle 14:58, 24 October 2011 (EDT)

Opposition

Neutral Comments

I don't really know, it looks pretty messy to me. The page certainly has enough information, and quite a few references, but image usage especially makes the page seem just ... I don't know, umm ... messy is still the best term I can think of. Especially the trivia section. Just a bit of cleaning and it has my vote. —ZENOX ^T C 22:16, 17 February 2011 (EST)
As I have already voted "for" Hyrule Castle this month, I'll just say that it is a good article, but I would recommend losing the trivia section if you wish it to have a real chance at being featured. Vyselink
The article is well written, and well-sourced. My only gripe is that it is perhaps the longest "common enemy" article, and it is not yet harmonized with the other "common enemy" articles that have, for the most part, taken on a similar layout. Once this is done, I think this'll be prime for featuring. User:Cipriano/sig 00:13, 14 March 2011 (EDT)

Negated/Retracted Votes

1. This picture just does not look good. I agree with Zenox. It is really messy. I hate that enemy anyway(Not that my opinion on the enemy itself matters.). TriforceSlash 12:24, 19 April 2011 (EDT) (this is about an article not a picture)'User:Mandi/sig 19:40, April 19, 2011 (UTC)

Kakariko Village

I expected less when I went to this article. I was surprised with the amount of detail it has. It's not the largest article, but it doesn't need to be. It is large enough to describe the village wonderfully and it has plenty of essential references. Reading it certainly stirs many memories.User:Matt/sig 02:33, February 16, 2011 (UTC)

Support

I don't really know why. I just think this article is good and helpful. --Toon Link Guy 00:39, 21 June 2011 (EDT)
Beautiful and well made page. Exemplifies our quality standards. --Xizor 20:11, 2 November 2011 (EDT)
This article has a nice, well designed structure that flows very well when reading, and has good sourcing and plenty of images. It's got my vote. Zelda4life 10:57, 7 November 2011 (EST)

Opposition

Neutral Comments

Negated/Retracted Votes

This is one of the first towns that you actually go to in one of the most famous Zelda games so i defiantly think it should be fetured --Fudgehog15 19:17, 28 August 2011 (EDT)

Articles are featured for the quality of their content. The subject itself is irrelevant. — Hylian King ^[*] 18:39, 29 August 2011 (EDT)

Chuchu

File:Chuchu.png

One of the greatest enemies in the Zelda series. The article is neat, detailed, descriptive, and not one chuchu is discluded. It encourages you to read the whole article. Very cute, and it deserves to be featured. --Masked Kafei 20:31, 3 May 2011 (EDT)

Support

Opposition

This article is lacking in references, and therefore, I do not think it is worthy of the title "featured". --TheHK ^{(T) (C)} 17:42, 11 October 2011 (EDT)
No references. No not one. Zelda4life 18:13, 7 November 2011 (EST)

Neutral Comments

Negated/Retracted Votes

1. Me like chuchu. --Toon Link Guy 00:40, 21 June 2011 (EDT)

Liking the subject of the article is not a valid vote. Dany36 21:27, 22 June 2011 (EDT)

Bow

As one of the usual handful of items and equipment in the Zelda series, and to Link, as he almost and always has in his inventory, this item is rather important as a tool and weapon throughout all of his adventure, as this article is very nicely detailed and described rather throughly, maybe short, but it's to the point of what it's to be and of it's use in the series with its upgrades. ~ Hylian Historic ~ 02:18, 10 June 2011 (EDT)

Support

Opposition

The article is alright, but isn't outstanding like a Featured Article should be. The article somewhat lacks neutrality. Although it may have potential, I think I can quite definitely say that it doesn't belong up there with the Featured Articles yet. — Hylian King ^[*] 20:43, 12 June 2011 (EDT)

Neutral Comments

I think the point of Featured Articles is being missed. Correct me if I'm wrong, but what makes an article feature worthy doesn't come from its importance to the series. There are better ones that should be featured *cough* Hyrule Castle *cough* but I'm staying neutral. Zelda4life 23:17, 24 June 2011 (EDT)

Negated/Retracted Votes

this article should be the fetured article because not only in almost every game but it's effective against most enimies --Ruchq 17:43, 24 June 2011 (EDT)ruchq

Has nothing to do with the content of the article, rather the subject.—ZENOX ^T C 01:42, 25 June 2011 (EDT)

Helmaroc King

File:Helmaroc King.png

This article is full of knowledge, without excess or repeated information. I think it has amazing detail, especially on the Appearances and Strategy section, and just shocked me when I first saw it. Including the figurine template and plenty of resources, I believe this article has the potential to be featured. --TheHK ^{(T) (C)} 18:05, 11 October 2011 (EDT)

Support

Agreed, for all the reasons stated in the nomination. --Xizor 18:38, 6 December 2011 (EST)

Opposition

Neutral Comments

Negated/Retracted Votes

Featured Articles

The featured articles are listed in this format:

Name of Article (Date it became featured)

Articles that have been disqualified are in the format:

~~Name of Article (Date it became featured)~~ (Date disqualified)

~~The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess (N/A)~~ (May 27, 2008)
~~Zelda Timeline (N/A)~~ (May 27, 2008)
Ganon (N/A)
~~Boomerang (N/A)~~ (October 14, 2008)
Stalfos (July 7, 2007)
~~ZeldaInformer (August 1, 2007)~~ (June 12, 2008)
~~Lake Hylia (October 2, 2007)~~ (November 24, 2008)
Zant (October 16, 2007)
Dark Link (November 5, 2007)
Link (December 15, 2007)
Princess Zelda (January 28, 2008)
Link's Crossbow Training (February 13, 2008)
Dodongo (February 15, 2008)
Moblin (February 18, 2008)
Majora's Mask (Boss) (March 8, 2008)
Pedestal of Time (April 6, 2008)
Triforce (May 17, 2008)
Midna (June 12, 2008)
Master Sword (June 17, 2008)
Gerudo (July 21, 2008)
Darknut (August 30, 2008)
Golden Goddesses (October 15, 2008)
Veran (November 24, 2008)
Goron (March 12, 2009)
Warping (April 30, 2009)
Sacred Realm (February 14, 2010)
Bomb (March 13, 2010)
Sage (May 9, 2010)
Fishing (November 30, 2010)
Hyrule Castle (August 29, 2011)