Talk:Mother & Child Isles

From Zelda Wiki.org

The name of this page is messed up! As with all pages, using an '&' in the title means that the page cannot be linked to directly: Mother & Child Isles. The only way to access it seems to be via the redirect Mother and Child Isles, so i've pointed all pages to that redirect, and decategorised this page, categorising the redirect instead. --Adamcox82 11:33, 29 June 2007 (PDT)

OK, I think I've fixed it by creating this redirect: Mother :)

--Adamcox82 11:39, 29 June 2007 (PDT)

Should there not be a separate page for Twilight Princess' Mother-and-Child Rocks? It isn't the same thing. Rob 64 12:31, 28 July 2008 (UTC)Rob 64

If you think that you can come up with enough content to actually justify a whole page. I can only think of a couple of sentences that would go on that page. —Ando (talk) 13:47, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

How about 'The Mother-and-Child Rocks are a notable part of Zora's Domain in The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess. The structures can be found in the central waters of the domain, and are significant as both an area where the native Reekfish congregate, and as a reference to the Mother & Child Isles found on the Great Sea in The Legend of Zelda: The Wind Waker. The rocks are much smaller in size than the isle, and it is unlikely that the two are related, since Twilight Princess and The Wind Waker take place at the same time in alternate timelines, and there is no such structure mentioned before or since in any other game.'

Is that enough, do you think? I think even that would do; the Mother-and-Child Rocks aren't the same thing as the Mother & Child Isles, afterall. Do you agree? I'm still slightly uncomfortable editing something without knowing if there is a concensus, but I guess this is a very minor article. It's not like it's a huge story element, huh? Rob 64 20:36, 28 July 2008 (UTC)Rob 64